ATTENTION:
BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
WHATSAPP US ON 08137701720
THE PROBLEM OF BEIGN IN HEGEL
1.1 Background of the study
The purpose of this paper is to explain Hegel’s solution to the
most fundamental problem of traditional metaphysics – how Being
is absolute in its nature and also relative in its determinations.
Two types of traditional approaches had been utilized to resolve
the problem of Being: via immanence and via transcendence.
Hegel was familiar with Spinoza’s approach through immanence
by which relative determinations (i.e., modes) are reducible to an
Absolute Substance in which they subsist. Hegel was also cognizant
of Kant’s approach through transcendence by which the
absolute is posited as the Unconditioned condition for .relative
determinations and remains unknowable through consciousness.
In other words, one approach joins the relative determinations
of being to their Absolute; while the other approach separates
Absolute Being from relative being. This paper contends that
Hegel’s approach to the problem of Being encompasses both
these previous approaches in order to provide a final solution to
the problem.
These two basic approaches have different advantages and
disadvantages to them. The advantage of the approach through
immanence is that it explains fully the relationship of the relative
determinations of beIng to their absolute. This relationship
must ultimately be some kind of identity or self-:-identity. However,
the approach through immanence collapses the distinction
between the absolute and its relative determinations in the
process of delineating their relationship. The disappearance of
this vital distinction constitutes the disadvantage of the approach
through immanence. The advantage of the approach
through transcendence is the emphasis which it places upon the
distinction between the Absolute and its relative determinations.
The disadvantage of this approach is its failure to explain
adequately the relationship between Absolute Being and relative
being. Consequently, the strands and weaknesses of each of the
approaches complement each other. Hegel’s approach to the
problem of Being will incorporate the strengths of the approach
through immanence and of the approach through transcendence;
while it also avoids the weaknesses in each of these traditional
approaches. Since it is without apparent contradiction or “inherent
inconsistency”, Hegel’s “immanence-transcendence” approach
constitutes a final solution to the problem of Being.
Hegel’s solution may be judged in terms of how well it analyzes
both the relationship and the distinction between Absolute
Being and relative being. More precisely, it may be evaluated in
accordance with its ability to delineate the relationship between
Absolute Being and relative being while it still preserves their
distinction. Hegel’s approach to the problem of Being is simply
more balanced than the approaches of his predecessors. Insofar
as the Absolute and its relative determinations remain “in balance”
with each other through their relationship to one another,
and in their distinction from each other, Hegel’s approach will be
able to resolve the problem of Being.
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420