ATTENTION:
BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
WHATSAPP US ON 08137701720
MLA HANDBOOK FOR WRITERS OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY JOSEPH GIBALDI (REVIEW)
Sample citations in the MLA Handbook confer a mode ofcelebrity on the authors cited. Citations come and go, but no one who is familiar with previous editions of the MLA Handbook will be surprised to hear that it continues its long life as an exemplary work in its new edition. The Handbook is sensible, clear, cogent, and as readable as a manual can be. The book offers abundant cross-references and an index. Explanations make some conventions less arbitrary than others and than they appear: for instance scientific systems of documentation emphasize dates more than MLA style does because research in the humanities has a longer shelf life than in the sciences (143), and the hanging indentations in the list of works cited make it easy to use an alphabetized list (145). As the design on the cover of the sixth edition suggests, while the angle is different, the pattern remains familiar. The sixth edition emphasizes the content of student writing more than its predecessors did, although it still privileges form, as it should. The rules haven’t changed much. The sixth edition restricts to ambiguous cases the direction in the fifth to bracket the dots that signify an ellipsis in a quotation to distinguish them from authorial ellipsis (117-118). Gibaldi points out that while conventions ofboth publication and citation have been well established for a long time as far as printed materials are concerned, those for electronic materials are uncertain and fluid (207-208). His guidelines for electronic sources are detailed, but necessarily provisional, and their tone is less authoritative than that of the earlier sections, for instance when he discusses “A Work in an Indeterminate Medium” (230). The font of the sample entries now suggests a printer, rather than a typewriter. One of the most valuable sections of the long first chapter on research and writing emphasizes the importance of evaluating sources and provides criteria (4 1-45). Gibaldi explains the difference between a site that is peer-reviewed and one that is self-published (41-42). Now that the web is the first and sometimes the only resource to which many students turn, they need the information here more than they probably realize. Gibaldi has added long sections, like those in many textbooks, on such subjects as choosing a topic and working through successive drafts; a summary follows each section. Writing however is a profoundly personal activity, and we all have to find our own ways of doing it, ways that may vary for each writer from text to text and project to project, as Gibaldi recognizes and takes into account
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420