EX-ANTE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF MARUCA RESISTANT Bt COWPEA IN KADUNA AND SOKOTO STATES, NIGERIA.

ATTENTION

BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!

INFORMATION:

YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420

WHATSAPP US ON  08137701720

EX-ANTE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF MARUCA RESISTANT Bt COWPEA IN KADUNA AND SOKOTO STATES, NIGERIA.

ABSTRACT

The broad objective of this study was to conduct an ex ante economic impact of maruca Bt cowpea in Kaduna and Sokoto states, Nigeria. The specific objectives of the study were to examine consumers‟ awareness/perceptions and preferences regarding Bt cowpea, to determine how much consumers were willing to pay for Bt cowpea quality attributes, to determine the effect of socio-economic characteristics of consumers on willingness to pay for the Bt cowpea, to predict the potential market share of transgenic Bt cowpea, and to measure the aggregate welfare net benefit of introducing the new Bt cowpea in the marketplace of the study areas. Using multi-stage random sampling technique, 12 Local Government Areas, 12 urban and 12 rural markets were randomly sampled from six Agricultural Development Project (ADP) Zones, in Kaduna and Sokoto states, Nigeria. A random sample of 208 consumers was selected from the cowpea consumer population. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, conditional and mixed logit discrete choice models. The descriptive combined result show that 19.71% of the respondents said they were aware of the new Bt cowpea, implying that consumer awareness of Bt cowpea was low in the study area. The result further revealed that about 20.19% respondents had little perceived knowledge of Bt cowpea in the study area. The results also indicated that 6.25% of the respondents exhibited ethical concerns while 2.2% perceived risks of toxic, 19.23% perceived that Bt cowpea has no disadvantages and 8.17% perceived the risks of environment in the study area. The conditional logit pooled results revealed that the respondents preferred cowpea large grain size and placed a relatively high level of importance on safety attribute of Bt cowpea in the study area. Results further showed that consumers were willing to pay premium or higher prices on cowpea large grain size (N92.90) and safety attributes (N186.77) in the study area. The age of consumers had a positive sign (0.002) and significant effect on willingness to pay for cowpea attributes at 5% level in the study area. Furthermore, the results of predicted market share indicated that the potential market share of Bt cowpea was low (40%) compared to conventional cowpea (60%) in the study area. Results from welfare analysis indicated that consumers would experience positive welfare net benefit of N242 billion in urban and N395 billion per year in rural areas, respectively, in the study area. This implies that Bt cowpea commercialization would have a significant impact on consumers‟ welfare in both rural and urban areas at 1% and 5% levels, respectively. The mixed logit pooled results revealed that the price coefficient showed the expected negative sign (-0.08) and was statistically significant at 5% level and distributed log normal. The coefficient of cowpea large grain size was normally distributed with an estimated mean of 0.742 and estimated standard deviation of 1.457. In other words, two third of the consumers had positive preference while one third had negative preference for cowpea large grain size. It was concluded that the mixed logit provided better representation of consumers‟ preferences or choice situation and give more information than conditional logit model. The study recommended the need for policy on decision-making to incorporate a few regulatory steps on safety into the regulatory approval and to assess the safety of Bt cowpea to be introduced. It is also recommended that research should ensure that insert resistant is not broken down.

HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)

After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to

08068231953 or 08168759420

(1)    Your project topics

(2)     Email Address

(3)     Payment Name

(4)    Teller Number

We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert

BANK ACCOUNTS

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 0046579864

Bank: GTBank.

OR

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 3139283609

Bank: FIRST BANK

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:

08068231953 or 08168759420

AFFILIATE LINKS:

myeasyproject.com.ng

easyprojectmaterials.com

easyprojectmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterial.net.ng

easyprojectmaterial.net.ng

projectmaterials.com.ng

googleprojectsng.blogspot.com

myprojectsng.blogspot.com.ng

https://projectmaterialsng.blogspot.com.ng/
https://foreasyprojectmaterials.blogspot.com.ng/
https://mypostumes.blogspot.com.ng/
https://myeasymaterials.blogspot.com.ng/
https://eazyprojectsmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/
https://easzprojectmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *